Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thomas Hicks v. T. Doyle
as 21-7330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS L. HICKS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. T. DOYLE, Medical Administrator, MR. ALVIN HARRIS, Medical Doctor and MS. J. FONTAINE, Medical Doctor
Hicks v. Doyle et al
as 1:2020cv00552
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Hicks
Defendant:
Mr Alvin Harris, Ms J Fortain and Ms T Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas L. Hicks v. VDOC
as 17-6945
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS L. HICKS
Respondent - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director
Hicks v. Wright
as 1:2016cv01278
Petitioner:
Thomas L. Hicks
Respondent:
Ed Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. Virginia Department of Corrections
as 1:2016cv00873
Petitioner:
Thomas L. Hicks
Respondent:
Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chachere et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 9:2010cv80141
Plaintiff:
Ellen J Crane , Clifton Davis, Jr. , Edwin A Davis, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Chachere et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 4:2009cv03592
Plaintiff:
George Chachere, Ellen J Crane, Clifton Davis, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Desan et al v. Bridgeport Port Authority et al
as 3:2009cv01605
Plaintiff:
Paul Desan, Joan Hughes, Denis Oddsen and others
Defendant:
Bridgeport Port Authority, City of Bridgeport, Dennis O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Napier et al. v. Hicks
as 3:2007cv00736
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Napier and Linda S. Walls
Defendant:
Thomas L. Hicks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv14303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
