Cases 1 - 10 of 89
DD Office Products, Inc. v. International Sourcing Group Ltd. et al
as 2:2021cv02602
Defendant:
International Sourcing Group Ltd., DOES 1 through 50 and Tim Morgan
Plaintiff:
DD Office Products, Inc. dba Liberty Paper and DD Office Products, Inc. doing business as Liberty Paper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Naylor et al v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2019cv04421
Plaintiff:
Hayley Goldfeld, James Kile, Jeannette Taylor and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Morgan et al
as 2:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Garcia
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection, Tim Morgan and Thomas B Morgan
Cause Of Action: Bivens
Breaux v. Morgan
as 2:2016cv01161
Plaintiff:
Gary Breaux
Defendant:
Tim Morgan
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ivory Simon v. Tim Morgan, et al
as 16-30081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVORY LANE SIMON
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM MORGAN, BRENDA SMILEY, JAMES M. LEBLANC and others
Freddie Lewis v. Public Safety & Corrections, et al
as 16-30037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE R. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, JACK GARNER, TIMOTHY WILKINSON and others
Richard Lay v. Jay Morgan, Warden
as 15-31085
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD LAY
Respondent - Appellee:
JAY TIM MORGAN, WARDEN, WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Kentell Simmons v. Tim Morgan, Warden
as 15-31027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENTELL SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY TIM MORGAN, WARDEN, WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Augustine v. Morgan et al
as 1:2015cv02697
Plaintiff:
Joseph Augustine
Defendant:
Tim Morgan, Honeycutt, Joe Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yilver Ponce v. Virgil Lucas, et al
as 15-30949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YILVER MORADEL PONCE
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGIL LUCAS, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, JACK GARNER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
