Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04910
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WATKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watkins v. Fox et al
as 2:2021cv00856
Defendant:
City of Hammond, Louisiana, Officer John Doe 3, Officer John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv81732
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv47443
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POOLE v. POWELL et al
as 7:2019cv00166
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
RON JAMES, Officer ROLLINS, PRESTON ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Watkins v. Brad Perkins
as 19-1866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
Hazen District Court, Keith Rhodes, Individually, David Smith, Individually and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Brad Perkins, Individually
Watkins v. Kemp et al
as 5:2017cv05210
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
R. Kemp and John Doe Deputies 1 to 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Watkins v. Brad Perkins, et al
as 15-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant - Appellee:
Brad Perkins, Individually, Billy's Trucking and David Smith, Individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
