Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Moses Shemtov v. Keith Jerome Tisdell et al
as 2:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Moses Shemtov
Defendant:
Keith Jerome Tisdell and DOES 1 to 10
TISDEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16469
Plaintiff:
KIM TISDEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Compton, Elbert v. Martin, Robert et al
as 3:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Elbert R. Compton
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Anthony M. Hentz, Tiffany Anderson and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifton Cox v. D. Tisdell, et al
as 23-5179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON COX
Defendant / Appellee:
D. TISDELL, Detective Memphis Police Officer, MEMPHIS, TN POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF MEMPHIS, TN
Tisdell v. Brutger Equities, Inc.
as 0:2022cv03037
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Tisdell
Defendant:
Brutger Equities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 fl FLSA: Maximum Hours
Tisdel
as 4:2022cv02350
Plaintiff:
Janece Tisdel
Defendant:
The Witness Protection Program (WPP) and The U S District Court Southern District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walker-Bey v. Tisdell et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Yomikalan Tashasha-June Walker-Bey
Defendant:
Adam Brian Tisdell, Daniel Micah Mehler, Tisdell Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tisdel v. The United States District Court et al
as 4:2022cv01804
Plaintiff:
Janece Tisdel
Defendant:
The United States District Court, The Witness Protection Program, The United States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Phyllis Tisdell v. Denis McDonough
as 21-3658
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Phyllis Tisdell
Defendant / Appellee:
Denis McDonough, Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans' Affairs
Tisdel v. Witness Protection
as 21-20484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Janece Tisdel
Defendant / Appellee:
The Witness Protection and Witness Protection
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
