Cases 1 - 10 of 100
WILSON v. MOYER et al
as 2:2026cv07198
Plaintiff:
JORDAN WILSON
Defendant:
BRETT MOYER, NATHANIEL T BRADLEY, KIMBERLY BRISKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
State of Utah v. Tobias
as 1:2026cv00159
Plaintiff:
State of Utah
Defendant:
Jayqwon Keyshawn Tobias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act - Enforcement
TOBIAS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
as 1:2026cv03184
Plaintiff:
JIMMY TOBIAS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ADAMS v. GUNDY et al
as 5:2026cv05799
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE ADAMS
Defendant:
CHIMENE VAN GUNDY, OUTSTANDING REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS, INC., EVERFLOW WEALTH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03565
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07474
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00933
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
