Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Hammonds v. Russell et al
as 2:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Gary Hammonds
Defendant:
Chris Russell, Amber Carter, Tom Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pate v. Mathes et al
as 2:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Pate
Defendant:
Chris Mathes, Tom Smith, Lt. Fritts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Gregory K Stout
Defendant:
Tom Smith and Amber Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. City of Parma et al
as 1:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Teresa L Phelps
Defendant:
City of Parma , Craig Telford , Albert Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pippin v. Carter County Detention Center et al
as 2:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Pippin
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center, Chris Mathis, Lt Fritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv05305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Tom Smith v. Kyle S Brodie et al
as 5:2013cv02255
Defendant:
Kyle S Brodie, Ricahrd L Fauhuguar, Andrew Hanal and others
Plaintiff:
Tom Smith
Tom Smith, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 13-11268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOM SMITH and PAULA SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, formerly known as Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWABS Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2003-5 and FULL SPECTRUM LENDING, INCORPORATED
Grindstaff v. Mathes et al
as 2:2013cv00304
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Grindstaff
Defendant:
Chris Mathes, Tom Smith, Gein Morland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Carter County Jail et al
as 2:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lee Armstrong, Jr
Defendant:
Carter County Jail, Tom Smith and Carter County Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
