Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Toomey v. O'Keefe
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Tia-Clair Toomey
Defendant:
Matt O'Keefe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Ashmore v. Toomey
as 6:2022cv01171
Plaintiff:
Beattie B Ashmore
Defendant:
Marc Toomey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Federal Receiver Case to Disgorge Profits
Toomey v. Ripple Labs, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv06518
Plaintiff:
Tyler Toomey and Markas Sergalis
Intervenor:
Bradley Sostack
Defendant:
Ripple Labs, Inc., XRP II, LLC, Bradley Garlinghouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toomey v. Ripple Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Ripple Labs, Inc., Bradley Garlinghouse and XRP II, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tyler Toomey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griggs et al v. New Dominion LLC et al
as 5:2017cv01232
Defendant:
Territory Resources LLC, Toomey Oil Company Inc, Dakota Exploration LLC and others
Plaintiff:
April Marler and Lisa Griggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Griggs et al v. New Dominion LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00942
Defendant:
Gastar Exploration Inc, Territory Resources LLC, Mid-Con Energy Operating LLC and others
Plaintiff:
April Marler and Lisa Griggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Gullett-El et al v. Corrigan et al
as 3:2017cv00881
Plaintiff:
Taquan Rahshe Gullett-El, Syteria Hephzibah-El and Aamaru Alien Religious Consul Association
Defendant:
Timothy J. Corrigan, Sean Patrick Flynn, W. Stephen Muldrow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Antonacci et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv03750
Plaintiff:
Louis B. Antonacci
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Anita J. Ponder, Law Offices of Ruth I. Major, P.C., The and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Toomey v. Delta and Pine Land Company
as 2:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Don Toomey
Defendant:
Delta and Pine Land Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
