Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steshawn Brisco v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
as 22-1616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STESHAWN BRISCO
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, Warden, Menard CC, ANGELA CRAIN, Medical Director, LISA GOLDMAN, Doctor, Mental Health Director and others
REID et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05108
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY REID, AARON JONES, CHRISTOPHER RONEY and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE M. LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simcox #311769 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01294
Defendant:
Unknown Repp, Unknown Cameron, Ronald Towles and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Simcox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brisco v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2020cv00366
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Dr. Siddiqui, Dr. Goldman and others
Plaintiff:
Steshawn Brisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody #277807 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Unknown Bentley, Arizona Department of Corrections and Unknown Towle
Plaintiff:
Raymond Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrick v. Ryan
as 2:2019cv05525
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Merrick
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, David Shinn, Ronald Towles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tartt v. Roberts et al
as 4:2018cv00510
Defendant:
D. W. Monson, Unknown Towle, Julie Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Tartt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tartt v. Roberts et al
as 5:2018cv05780
Defendant:
D. W. Monson, Meegan Muse, Towle and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Tartt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tartt v. Roberts et al
as 4:2018cv00475
Defendant:
Meegan Muse, DW Monson, Unknown Northten and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Tartt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
