Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 70
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
HART et al v. TWEEN BRANDS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00399
Plaintiff: JOSEPH W. HART , REBECCA MOORE and CHRISTY YOUNGS
Defendant: TWEEN BRANDS, INC. and SAKAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Landmark Technology, LLC v. Body Central Corp et al
as 6:2011cv00322
Defendant: Body Central Corp , CASUAL MALE RETAIL GROUP, INC. , Christopher & Banks, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Landmark Technology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Norman Rothman v. The Dress Barn, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03630
Defendant: Does, The Dress Barn, Inc. and Tween Brands, Inc.
Plaintiff: Norma Rothman
Miss Matched, Inc. v. The Dress Barn, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07124
Defendant: Tween Brands, Inc., Tween Brands Investment, LLC and The Dress Barn, Inc.
Plaintiff: Miss Matched, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mark Hovila v. Tween Brands, Inc.
as 10-80124
Plaintiff - Respondent: MARK HOVILA
Defendant - Petitioner: TWEEN BRANDS, INC.
Mendez v. Tween Brands Inc
as 2:2010at00030
Plaintiff: Holli Mendez
Defendant: Tween Brands Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Type: Labor › Plaintiff
Mendez v. Tween Brands Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00072
Plaintiff: Holli Mendez
Defendant: Tween Brands Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01717
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hovila v. Tween Brands Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00491
Plaintiff: Mark Hovila and Mark Hovila
Defendant: Tween Brands Inc and Tween Brands Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Miroglio S.P.A. v. B.W.I. L.L.C. et al
as 1:2008cv09834
Plaintiff: Miroglio S.P.A. and Miroglio S.P.A.
Defendant: B.W.I. L.L.C. and Tween Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?