Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yong Uk Lee v. The Talbots, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03866
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and The Talbots, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Yong Uk Lee an Individual doing business as Wongab Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Piper et al v. The Talbots Inc.
as 1:2020cv10297
Plaintiff:
Brenda Ruark, Lois Piper, Melissa Register and others
Defendant:
The Talbots Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SUTTER et al v. CASCADES TISSUE GROUP - PENNSYLVANIA, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00182
Defendant:
CASCADES HOLDING US, INC., PLAINWELL, INC., Cascades Tissue Group - Pennsylvania, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN SUTTER and SHIRLEY SUTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10748
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05793
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SUTTER et al v. CASCADES TISSUE GROUP - PENNSYLVANIA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02201
Defendant:
CASCADES HOLDING US, INC., POPE & TALBOT, WIS., INC., PLAINWELL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN SUTTER and SHIRLEY SUTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
