Cases 51 - 60 of 302
ROOT INSURANCE COMPANY v. APPLETON et al
as 1:2021cv03119
Plaintiff:
ROOT INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
RANDALL APPLETON, TAMMY APPLETON, TAMARA PUZZELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MERSCHAT v. SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS
as 2:2021cv01835
Plaintiff:
TAMARA MERSCHAT
Defendant:
SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2021cv24371
Plaintiff:
Tamara Rodriguez
Defendant:
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tamas v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv04095
Plaintiff:
Tamara Tamas
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Harrison Hines et al v. Azoth Investment SPC Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv10309
Plaintiff:
Harrison Hines and Argonautic Ventures Master SPC
Defendant:
Azoth Investment SPC Ltd., Cassandra Shi, Tamara Frankel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ds
Bateman v. Anthem Life Insurance
as 0:2021cv00209
Plaintiff:
Tamara Bateman
Defendant:
Anthem Life Insurance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Eire v. Foremost Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00108
Plaintiff:
Tamara Eire
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan and Foremost Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Poindexter-Ketcham v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 0:2021cv62162
Plaintiff:
Tamara Poindexter-Ketcham
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Owners Insurance Company v. Dock et al
as 4:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tamara Nicole Dock and Antoine Omar McLendon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOSEPH et al v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 0:2021cv61730
Plaintiff:
JEAN JOSEPH and TAMARA JOSEPH
Defendant:
AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
