Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 4:2020cv01250
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Julia Kim Williams, Tawana Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jerome Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRUIETT et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv11167
Plaintiff:
JUANITA PRUIETT and TAWANA SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilbert v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2017cv00299
Plaintiff:
Gerald E. Gilbert
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston, James W. Mossbarger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard Lee v. Tawana Smith, et al
as 16-40464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD WAYNE LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
TAWANA SMITH, Medical Doctor, LINDA SMALLEY, Registered Nurse, CARRI CANTRELL, LVN and others
Lee v. Smith et al
as 6:2015cv00572
Plaintiff:
Howard Wayne Lee
Defendant:
Tawana Smith, Linda Smalley, Carri Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brogdon v. Hudspeth et al
as 4:2014cv03277
Plaintiff:
Guy Christopher Brogdon
Defendant:
Monty Hudspeth, Gwenevene E. Williams, MD-ADS, Tawana Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flaming v. Hudspeth et al
as 4:2014cv02797
Petitioner:
Jarrod Neal Flaming
Defendant:
Monty Hudspeth, Gwenevene Williams, MD and Tawana Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driscoll v. Hudspeth et al
as 4:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
John Robert Driscoll
Respondent:
Monty Hudspeth , Tawana Smith and Susan Dostal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Smith
as 4:2013cv02675
Petitioner:
Robert George Miller
Respondent:
Tawana Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
