Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jesse Simpson v. A. McCabe
as 22-6282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. MCCABE, DAP-C Chief of Psychology, C. GOMEZ, Warden, WOLEVER, Associate Warden and others
Tejera v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv01868
Plaintiff:
Orlando Tejera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simpson v. McCabe et al
as 3:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Breece, Santiago, Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Russell Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2019cv03173
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Tejera v. Secretary, DOC
as 17-15191
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID TEJERA
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Tejera v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 1:2017cv23567
Plaintiff:
David A. Tejera
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McNair et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02882
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Abraham Thomas, Jose Pizarro and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, N.Y.C.D.O.C. Dept. Transportation Comm. John/Jane Doe and Bus Drivers John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02884
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Peter Bohning, Abraham Thomas and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02314
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Abraham Thomas, Peter Bohning and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, N.Y.C. D.O.C. Dept. Transportation Comm., John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
