Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jones v. Gore et al
as 2:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Gore, Dr. Luang and Ms. Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 2:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Terrance Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. Gore et al
as 2:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Gore, Dr. Luang and Ms. Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01188
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE JONES
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashok Babu, et al v. Gregory Ahern, et al
as 22-15355
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ASHOK BABU, ROBERT BELL, IBRAHIM KEEGAN-HORNSBY and others
Appellant:
TYLER ABBOTT, ANTHONY AARON, ROBERT ABEYTA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY J. AHERN, Sheriff; in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Alameda County Sheriffs Office, CAROL BURTON, in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency, KARYN L. TRIBBLE, in her official capacity as Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency and others
Defendant:
RAYANN KRUM, TREVOR SPINGOLA and ROBERT ABEYDA
Hylton v. Eubanks et al
as 9:2021cv81069
Defendant:
Terrance Jones, Transport Deputy, Deputy Eubanks and others
Plaintiff:
Maliik N. Hylton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USA
as 1:2020cv02017
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Terrance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Samad #265812 v. Foxx et al
as 2:2016cv00274
Plaintiff:
Ricky Samad #265812
Defendant:
Mario Foxx, Myron Foxx, Doug Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Cedric Jone
as 13-50845
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CEDRIC TERRANCE JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
