Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Walker et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker and Amber Bishop
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, City of Harrodsburg, Kentucky and J.D. Pal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16543
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KAIWAN TERRENCE WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Motor City Pawn Brokers Inc. v. NLRB
as 20-1730
Respondent:
TERRENCE WALKER, PATRICIA TILMON and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Petitioner:
MOTOR CITY PAWN BROKERS INC.
Walker v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2020cv00174
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02782
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03139
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DECARLO, CHRISTOPHER MORGAN, SCOTT PASSMORE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ellis et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02099
Plaintiff:
William DeCarlo, Christopher Morgan, Scott Passmore and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
WALKER v. BROWN
as 2:2019cv00119
Petitioner:
TERRENCE WALKER
Respondent:
RICHARD D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Cook County et al
as 1:2013cv06829
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker
Defendant:
Cook County, Cook County Department of Corrections, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
