Cases 1 - 10 of 29
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Baker et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Calvin Baker and Terry Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Baker v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.
as 1:2017cv11491
Plaintiff:
Terry Baker
Defendant:
Guaranteed Rate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. Conn et al
as 1:2017cv03289
Defendant:
Barden Conn, Craig Stelzer, Richard Romano and others
Plaintiff:
Guaranteed Rate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Baker et al v. Vantage Travel Services, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Terri Baker and Gary Baker
Defendant:
Vantage Travel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adeyemi et al v. Maxum Petroleum Operating Company et al
as 7:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Taiwo Ayorinde, Jimoh Adeyemi, Adeniyi Akinwale and others
Defendant:
Maxum Petroleum Operating Company and Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Baker v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv12379
Plaintiff:
Terry Baker
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Shawn Brewer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
