Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Rollenhagen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Rollenhagen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Rollenhagen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Terri Rollenhagen and Terri Lynn Rollenhagen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Johnson et al v. Benson
as 1:2020cv00948
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson
Plaintiff:
Marian Sheridan, Ruth Johnson and Terri Lynn Land
Petitioner:
Mr. Jim Pedersen, Detroit/Downriver Chapter of the A. Philip Randolph Institute, Mr. Charles Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2019cv12778
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michigan Republican Party et al v. Benson
as 1:2019cv00669
Plaintiff:
Michigan Republican Party, Hank Vaupel, Dorian Thompson and others
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Count MI Vote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Thai Summit America Corporation and Woravth Iddhibhakdibongse
as 2:2017cv13354
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Taylor
Defendant:
Thai Summit America Corporation and Woravth Iddhibhakdibongse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Strickland v. Michigan Secretary of State et al
as 1:2010cv01119
Plaintiff:
Chase R. Strickland
Defendant:
Michigan Secretary of State and Terri Lynn Land
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore #208999 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv00213
Plaintiff:
Jonah Moore #208999
Defendant:
Patricia L. Caruso, Terri Lynn Land, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
