Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Parker v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 1:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Parker
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners and Terry LNU
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Smith, et al
as 16-4036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
MEGAN SMITH, U.S. Marshal's Service Inspector, RICK CASAS, U.S. Marshal's Service Inspector, JAMES A. THOMPSON, U.S. Marshal for District of Utah and others
Webb v. Smith, et al
as 16-4030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
MEGAN SMITH, U.S. Marshal's Service Inspector, RICK CASAS, U.S. Marshal's Service Inspector, JAMES A. THOMPSON, U.S. Marshal for District of Utah and others
Webb v. Smith, et al
as 16-4018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
MEGAN SMITH, U.S. Marshal's Service Inspector, RICK CASAS, U.S. Marshal's Service Inspector, JAMES A. THOMPSON, U.S. Marshal for District of Utah and others
Wherry v. Tripi et al
as 1:2011cv02784
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J. Wherry, Sr.
Defendant:
Phillip J Tripi, Steven Deteilbach, Jeffrey Grondolsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stowe v. Newton County et al
as 1:2011cv00916
Plaintiff:
Darrell Anthony Stowe
Defendant:
Newton County, Ozburn, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stowe v. Newton County et al
as 3:2011cv00020
Plaintiff:
Darrell Anthony Stowe
Defendant:
Newton County, Ozburn, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
