Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Kshetri v. Garland
as 21-60448
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Tham Bahadur Kshetri
(PC) Gonzales v. Tham et al
as 1:2020cv00800
Defendant:
Shaffer, Maya, Kings County Deputies and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bui v. Frauenheim
as 3:2020cv01847
Respondent:
Warden S. Frauenheim
Petitioner:
Tham Bui
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kham v. Tham, et al.
as 1:2019cv00606
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Thanty Tham
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Sunnary Kham and Sam Kham
3Rd Party Defendant:
Doe Corporations, Partnerships and Other Entities 1-10 and Michael L. Prather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zegarra Tham v. infinity indemnity
as 1:2019cv24529
Defendant:
infinity indemnity
Plaintiff:
Grethel Patricia Zegarra Tham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tham v. Infinity Indemnity Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv24530
Defendant:
Infinity Indemnity Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Grethel Patricia Zegarra Tham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Annapolis, Maryland v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45710
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Tormarco Harris, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Annapolis, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
The City of Annapolis, Maryland v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv01162
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Physical Medicine and Pain Management Associates, P.C., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Annapolis, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00037
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00674
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
