Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba in United States
as 24-1532
Plaintiff: PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, d/b/a United Emrits of America, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897
Defendant: REPUBLIC OF CUBA, EMBASSY OF CUBA IN UNITED STATES, CUBAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE, (CIS) and MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Rubublic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba in United States, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01738
Plaintiff: Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Political Action Comittee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America also known as Ronald Satish Emrit and Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba in United States, The, Cuban Intelligence Service and Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant: The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. Republic of Cuba et al
as 3:2024cv00673
Plaintiff: Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant: The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Emrit et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 3:2024cv00629
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant: The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EMRIT v. THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA et al
as 2:2024cv04707
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA, THE EMBASSY OF CUBA, CUBAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant: The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Said v. Ministry of Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv01073
Plaintiff: Mohamed Fathy Said
Defendant: US Department of Justice "Diplomatic Rights", Ministry of Administrative Development, Labour and Social Affairs, Ministry of Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 251 Public Contracts-Review of Agency Action
GHEBREYESUS et al v. FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01717
Petitioner: SIMRET ZERAI YOHANNES, FREMICHAEL GHEBREYESUS and SIMRET ZEREYOHANS KELEB
Respondent: BROOK BEKELE BESHAH, FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF ETHIOPIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Said et al v. Egyptian Embassy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01498
Plaintiff: Mohamed Fathy Said and N.E.S.
Defendant: Egyptian Embassy, Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Egyptian Ministry of Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?