Cases 21 - 30 of 589
Kinder Morgan, Inc. v. EPA, et al
as 23-1181
Petitioner:
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. EPA
Intervenor:
State of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
State of Washington, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-35294
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
Commodity Futures v. TMTE, Inc.
as 23-10420
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Alabama Securities Commission, State of Alaska and others
Appellee:
Kelly Crawford
Appellant:
Daniel Bruce Spitzer
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
United States of America et al v. ABF Freight System, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
ABF Freight System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Pollutants & Permit Violations
United States of America et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10511
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, District of Columbia and others
Defendant:
JetBlue Airways Corporation and Spirit Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
State of Washington et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 1:2023cv03026
Plaintiff:
State of Washington, State of Oregon, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert M Califf, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Montana and others
Amicus Curiae:
Legal Voice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
State of California, et al v. EPA
as 23-1020
Petitioner:
State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Illinois and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, Brady, 16 Major Cities and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11071
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, Brady, State of New Jersey and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
