Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv11993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JEFFRIES v. TEEN CHALLENGE TRAINING CENTER et al
as 5:2014cv07117
Plaintiff:
HARRY JEFFRIES
Defendant:
TEEN CHALLENGE TRAINING CENTER and JOSEPH BATLUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox et al v. Prince Georges County, Maryland et al
as 8:2014cv03408
Plaintiff:
Donnell David Cox, Jr, Mercedes T. Cox, Shanell Cox and others
Defendant:
Prince Georges County, Maryland, John S. Farrell, Prince George's Coutny Police Detective B.E.Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JEFFRIES v. DORBRANSKY
as 5:2014cv05755
Plaintiff:
HARRY JEFFRIES
Defendant:
BETH DORBRANSKY and TEEN CHALLENGE TRAINING CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Theodore Wagner v. Monica Hampton
as 14-1876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE THOMAS WAGNER
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER MONICA HAMPTON, all in their Individual and Official Capacity, OFFICER RUTH DAUGHERTY, all in their Individual and Official Capacity, OFFICER DONALD SIMMONS, all in their Individual and Official Capacity and others
Movant - Appellee:
NATIONAL CHILD PROTECTION TRAINING CENTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-15503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
