Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 53
ATLAN AMEXEM EMPIRE v. UNITED STATES INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00200
Plaintiff: SHAYKAMAXUM ATLAN AMEXEM EMPIRE
Defendant: UNITED STATES INC., ANNE C. CONWAY, GREGORY J. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02872
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Donaldson v. United States, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv22464
Plaintiff: Felecia Donaldson
Defendant: United States, Inc., State of Florida, Inc., Miami Dade County Parks and Recreation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Kevin Todd v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 12-5038
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN TODD
Defendant - Appellee: UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC., aka Unilever Supply Chain, Inc., aka Ragu Foods Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv01428
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv04196
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01072
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Clausell v. The United States, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03617
Plaintiff: Jimmy Clausell
Defendant: The United States, Inc., The State of Georgia, Inc., Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01405
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Todd v. Unilever United States, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00063
Plaintiff: Kevin Todd
Defendant: Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?