Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Kendall Smith v. U.S. Judge Paula Xinis
as 24-1365
Plaintiff:
KENDALL R. SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. JUDGE PAULA XINIS, STATE OF MARYLAND and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Brown v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Scott Jenkins, Dale Durrer, Carson Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. United States Government
as 1:2023cv01808
Plaintiff:
Alford Conley Yates
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENNINGS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00801
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND RONALD JENNINGS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Lunsford v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023ct03126
Plaintiff:
Jamel Tyree Lunsford
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, State of North Carolina and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUNSFORD v. NC DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
JAMEL TYREE LUNSFORD
Defendant:
NC DEPT. OF CORRECTION, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Kevin Smith v. United States Government
as 23-1044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CABARRUS COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA and others
JENNINGS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2022cv01118
Petitioner:
RAYMOND RONALD JENNINGS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. United States Government
as 3:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Russell Dunbar Smith, Jr
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. United States Government
as 5:2022ct03374
Plaintiff:
Logan N. Young
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
