Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Woldesilassie v. Bishop et al
as 4:2022cv03672
Plaintiff:
Kahsay Woldesilassie
Defendant:
Thomas Lee Bishop and Golding Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Bishop v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv01212
Defendant:
3M Company, The, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lynn Bishop, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. POST et al
as 4:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Asst. D.A. Mark Post, RONNIE JOE LANE, STEPHEN LOUIS A. DILLARD and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Post et al
as 1:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Ronnie Joe Lane, Stephen Louis A. Dillard, Mark Post and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smigelski v. Peter
as 13-832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jacek I. Smigelski
Defendant - Appellee:
Ellen Ash Peters, Individually and in Official Capacity, AKA Ellen A. Blumberg, Thomas A. Bishop, Individually and in Official Capacity, Lubbie Harper, Jr., Individually and in Official Capacity and others
Bradley v. Abram
as 12-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey Spruill, Jane Doe, Mrs. Corey Spruill, Terrance Copper and others
Bradley v. Abram
as 12-2589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey Spruill, Jane Doe, Mrs. Corey Spruill, Terrance Copper and others
Bradley v. Abram
as 12-2591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey Spruill, Jane Doe, Mrs. Corey Spruill, Terrance Copper and others
Bradley v. Abram
as 12-2316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey Spruill, Jane Doe, Mrs. Corey Spruill, Terrance Copper and others
Patterson v. Chin et al
as 3:2012cv00573
Plaintiff:
Ronald Patterson
Defendant:
Denny Chin, Peter W. Hall, Debra Ann Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
