Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jenkins v. Gruber et al
as 1:2023cv03803
Plaintiff:
William J. Jenkins
Defendant:
Terrence Gruber, Thomas Conroy, Mark Soustek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. The City of Joliet et al
as 1:2017cv06246
Plaintiff:
Lee Blankenship
Defendant:
The City of Joliet, Will County, Joliet Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haplin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00817
Plaintiff:
Carol Haplin and Thomas Conroy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elijah Manuel v. City of Joliet, et al
as 14-1581
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH MANUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF JOLIET, a municipal corporation, TERRENCE J. GRUBER, #261, THOMAS CONROY, #271 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hudson v. Rosado et al
as 1:2013cv05577
Plaintiff:
Hilton Hudson
Defendant:
Joseph Rosado, Aaron Bandy, Thomas Conroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-6869
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Manuel v. City of Joliet et al
as 1:2013cv03022
Plaintiff:
Elijah Manuel
Defendant:
City of Joliet, Terrence J. Gruber, Thomas Conroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinnis v. Bandy et al
as 1:2011cv06293
Plaintiff:
Markeis L. McKinnis
Defendant:
Aaron Bandy, Thomas Conroy and Terrence Gruber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIECHOWSKI v. STAFFORD TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2010cv04252
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PIECHOWSKI
Defendant:
STAFFORD TOWNSHIP, THOMAS CONROY, JOHN DOES 6-10 (fictitious individuals) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
