Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Davis v. GEICO Indemnity Company
as 3:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Defendant:
GEICO Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Thomas Davis v. Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas
as 22-3441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
DAVIS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
as 2:2022cv01275
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis v. Loeb
as 3:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Harvey Loeb
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DAVIS v. THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 2:2020cv01745
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv08265
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas Davis v. County of Allegheny, et al
as 19-2703
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER ALLEGHENY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS DAVIS
DAVIS v. THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2018cv00794
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY and OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2018cv00450
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY and OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagan et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv00270
Plaintiff:
Damont Hagan, Raphael Spearman and Thomas Davis
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, Tabb Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
