Cases 1 - 10 of 331
Perimeter Solutions LP v. Davis
as 4:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Perimeter Solutions LP
Defendant:
Thomas Davis
Davis v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Texas Thomas Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bowman et al v Ingersoll-Rand Industrial U.S. Inc
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
DALLAS BOWMAN, THOMAS DAVIES, FRED FURLANO, SR. and others
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND INDUSTRIAL U.S., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Davies v. Konica Minolta Healthcare Americas, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davies
Defendant:
KONICA MINOLTA HEALTHCARE AMERICAS, INC.
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13978
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04312
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doe et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Tim Brown
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Anica Letica, One Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
