Cases 1 - 10 of 25
(HC) Leonard v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2023cv02693
Petitioner:
Thomas Frederick Leonard
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERBEST v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03074
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FREDERICK HERBEST
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROGERS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2023cv12561
Plaintiff:
THOMAS-FREDERICK ROGERS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROGERS v. ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN REPRESENTATIVE
as 2:2023cv01473
Plaintiff:
THOMAS-FREDERICK ROGERS
Defendant:
ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN REPRESENTATIVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROGERS v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2022cv05927
Plaintiff:
THOMAS-FREDERICK ROGERS
Defendant:
PHILIP MURPHY, MATTHEW J. PLATKIN and WILLIAM T. WALSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FREDERICK v. MURPHY
as 2:2021cv18482
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FREDERICK
Defendant:
PHILIP MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12772
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FREDERICK HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frederick v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00234
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Thomas Frederick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Frederick v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2020cv02845
Petitioner:
Thomas Frederick
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROGERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv04553
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
THOMAS-FREDERICK ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
