Cases 1 - 10 of 25
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
Manheim Remarketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Layton and Nevada Fleet, LLC
Manheim Remarketing, Inc. v. Thomas Layton et al
as 2:2023ms00077
Plaintiff:
Manheim Remarketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Layton and Nevada Fleet, LLC
Daniel Dydzak v. Midfirst Bank, et al
as 23-16193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant / Appellee:
MIDFIRST BANK, TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, WILLIAM S. DATO and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. CANBY, MAXINE M. CHESNEY, MOLLY DWYER and others
Daniel Dydzak v. Midfirst Bank, et al
as 23-16122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant / Appellee:
MIDFIRST BANK, TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, WILLIAM S. DATO and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. CANBY, MAXINE M. CHESNEY, MOLLY DWYER and others
Daniel Dydzak v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 23-15784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant / Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, MIDFIRST BANK, WILLIAM C. CANBY and others
Green v. Layton
as 2:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Green
Defendant:
Earl Thomas Layton and E. Thomas Layton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Manheim Remarketing, Inc. v. Layton et al
as 1:2022cv02822
Petitioner:
Manheim Remarketing, Inc. doing business as Manheim Lakeland
Respondent:
Thomas Layton and Nevada Fleet, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 09 Application for Confirmation of Arbitration Award
Dydzak v. Cantil-Sakauye et al
as 2:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Dydzak
Defendant:
Tani Cantil-Sakauye, 1st Century Bancshares, Inc., 1st Century Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Daniel Dydzak v. Edward Chen, et al
as 18-15900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD M. CHEN, PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, PETER LIND SHAW and others
Daniel Dydzak v. Edward Chen, et al
as 18-15674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD M. CHEN, PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, PETER LIND SHAW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
