Cases 1 - 10 of 12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 1:2019cv01059
Defendant:
TERESA DENISE SCHNEIDER, FRED DOUGLAS PERKINS, JR., THOMAS P SCHNEIDER and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3301
Brownlee v. Schneider et al
as 2:2018cv02156
Plaintiff:
Robert Brownlee, Jr
Defendant:
Thomas P Schneider, M T Reynolds and Unknown Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Brown et al
as 2:2017cv02239
Plaintiff:
Eric D Perry
Defendant:
Antonio Brown, Thomas P Schneider and Head Nurse of the Macon County Jail Health Care Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beiler v. Schneider et al
as 2:2017cv02196
Plaintiff:
Alan Beiler, Sr
Defendant:
Thomas P Schneider, . Hotwick, . Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Tanner et al
as 2:2017cv02116
Plaintiff:
Scott D Thompson
Defendant:
Joshua Tanner , Stephen Bean , Edward D Yoder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yancey v. Macon County Illinois et al
as 2:2017cv02048
Plaintiff:
Heather Yancey
Defendant:
Macon County Illinois, Thomas P Schneider, Bill Hotwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Flannery et al
as 2:2014cv02266
Plaintiff:
Adam C Smith
Defendant:
Flannery, Samuel Hubner, Antonio Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Smith v. Macon County Auditor's Office et al
as 2:2014cv02177
Plaintiff:
Adam C Smith
Defendant:
Macon County Auditor's Office , Arthur J Gallagher, Travelers Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Schneider et al
as 3:2013cv03183
Plaintiff:
Emanuel W Hayes
Defendant:
Thomas P Schneider, Neil Williamson and Terry Durr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
