Cases 11 - 19 of 19
BARBER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2010cv00497
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE BARBER
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THOMAS ROWLANDS, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELLOM v. ROWLANDS et al
as 2:2009cv01371
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant:
THOMAS ROWLANDS and DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kiara Smith v. Larry Norris, et al
as 08-2357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kiara Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Chief Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelly, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Smith v. Norris et al
as 5:2008cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kiara A Smith
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kiara Smith v. Steven Broughton, et al
as 08-1369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kiara Smith
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelly, Deputy Director, ADC, James Gibson, Officer Administrator, ADC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Steven Broughton, Dr. , (Originally sued as a John Doe Defendant) and Ravi Mehta, Dr. , (Originally sued as John Doe Defendant)
Smith v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2007cv00186
Plaintiff:
Kiara Smith
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Keni quetrix Strain, Kim Luckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
Kiara A Smith
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Kim Luckett, Grant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Norris et al
as 5:2007cv00086
Plaintiff:
Kiara Smith
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Wendy Kelly, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Baker et al
as 5:2007cv00081
Plaintiff:
Marlon D Miles
Defendant:
Samuel Baker, Angela Lewis, Kim Luckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
