Cases 51 - 60 of 102
TOLLOIVER et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS TOLLOIVER and JOHN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guardian Protection Services, Inc. v. Wright et al
as 3:2014cv00866
Plaintiff:
Guardian Protection Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Wright and Guardian Services VA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
SANTIAGO et al v. HULMES et al
as 2:2014cv07109
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS SANTIAGO , MARGARITA SANTIAGO and EXOR SANTIAGO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY, PATRICK BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWTON v. MCCLOSKY et al
as 2:2014cv06799
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NEWTON and LUZ GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCCLOSKY, MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURDIE et al v. SPICER et al
as 2:2014cv06639
Plaintiff:
RONALD PURDIE , RAGIB WITHERSPOON and JAMES FANNINGS
Defendant:
MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bliss v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04247
Plaintiff:
Rishon Bliss
Defendant:
The City of New York and NYPD Officer Thomas Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19173
Plaintiff:
Shiela Powers and Thomas Wright
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORTEZ et al v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2014cv03144
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE , INSPECTOR X , BACCARAT and others
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-36158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Howard v. Real et al
as 6:2013cv01438
Defendant:
Al Hannon, Greg Jones, Jamie Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton L. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
