Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Tice v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14737
Plaintiff:
Peggy Tice
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tice v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02108
Plaintiff:
Arden A. Tice
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akers et al v. Cook Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv23850
Plaintiff:
Cleta Akers , Analea Klampe , Tina Manon and others
Defendant:
Cook Group, Inc. , Cook Incorporated , Cook Biotech, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tice et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv15379
Plaintiff:
Kathy Tice and Brett Tice
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tice et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv09876
Plaintiff:
Doris Tice and Ricky Tice
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alexander v. Tice
as 3:2012cv00116
Plaintiff:
Joyce Alexander
Defendant:
Justin H. Tice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Derek Tice v. Gene Johnson
as 09-8245
Petitioner - Appellee:
DEREK ELLIOTT TICE
Respondent - Appellant:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Jay Lurz v. Jon Galley
as 08-6573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY TIMOTHY LURZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JON P. GALLEY, Warden, OFC. L. WHITEMAN, CO2, LT. ARNOLD, H.U.#6 Manager and others
Tice v. Johnson
as 3:2008cv00069
Petitioner:
Derek Elliott Tice
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Charleston County Detention Center et al
as 2:2007cv01364
Plaintiff:
Tessa Rani Gibson
Defendant:
Charleston County Detention Center, Mark A Lewis, Donald V Salters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
