Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Jackson v. United States et al
as 3:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson
Defendant:
United States, Middle District of Pennsylvania, Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph v. Betti et al
as 1:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Stanley R. Joseph
Respondent:
Tim Betti and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 State Petn for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Sewell v. Betti et al
as 1:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Paul Sewell
Defendant:
Tim Betti, Lackawanna County Prison Board, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Tisdale v. Tim Betti, et al
as 22-2755
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES J. TISDALE
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM BETTI, Warden, WELLPATH MEDICAL, DR. AMED and others
Wong v. Betti et al
as 1:2022cv01063
Plaintiff:
Steven Wong
Defendant:
Tim Betti, Wellpath and Lackawanna County Jail Administration Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLEESE v. COGNETTI et al
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Quinton M. Mccleese
Defendant:
Paige Cognetti, William Shanley, Lackawanna County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
MCCLEESE v. COGNETTI et al
as 1:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
QUINTON M. MCCLEESE
Defendant:
MAYOR PAIGE COGNETTI, WILLIAM SHANLEY, LACKAWANNA COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Soler v. Betti et al
as 1:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Luis Soler
Defendant:
Tim Betti, Krista Puris, Jessica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nieves v. Geroulo et al
as 4:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Luis Nieves
Defendant:
Vito Tim Geroulo, Tim Betti and Donna Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
