Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff: Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant: Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Optimum Productions, et al v. Home Box Office, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56222
Defendant / Appellant: HOME BOX OFFICE, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 5, business entities unknown; 6 through 10, business indivduals unknown and HOME BOX OFFICE, a Division of Time Warner Entertainment L.P. a Delaware Limited Partnership
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOHN BRANCA, OPTIMUM PRODUCTIONS, a California corporation and JOHN MCCLAIN, in the Respective Capacities as Co-Executor of the Estate of Michael J. Jackson
Optimum Productions et al v. Home Box Office et al
as 2:2019cv01862
Defendant: Does 1 through 5, Home Box Office Inc. a Delaware Corporation, Does 6 through 10 and others
Plaintiff: John Branca and John Mcclain in the Respective Capacities as Co-Executors of the Estate of Michael J. Jackson, Optimum Productions a California Corporation, Optimum Productions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cableview Communications, et al v. Time Warner Cable Southeast, et al
as 19-10855
Defendant / Appellee: TIME WARNER CABLE SOUTHEAST LLC, a.k.a. Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, a.k.a. Time Warner Entertainment Company, LP, a.k.a. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, d.b.a. Time Warner Cable and TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP, d.b.a. Time Warner Cable
Plaintiff / Appellant: CABLEVIEW COMMUNICATIONS OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., a Florida Corporation
Undetermined: JOHN D. WEBB
John D. Webb v. Time Warner Cable Southeast LL, et al
as 18-11553
Interested Party - Appellant: JOHN D. WEBB
Defendant - Appellee: TIME WARNER CABLE SOUTHEAST LLC, a.k.a. Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC f.k.a. Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. a.k.a.Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership d.b.a. Time Warner Cable and TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP, d.b.a. Time Warner Cable
Sydney v. Time Warner Entertainment-Adva
as 17-1219
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jeffrey Sydney, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and Stephen Capousis, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership
Defendant: Time Warner Cable, Inc.
Cableview Communications Of J v. Time Warner Cable Southeast LL, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-10701
Plaintiff - Appellant: CABLEVIEW COMMUNICATIONS OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., a Florida Corporation
Defendant - Appellee: TIME WARNER CABLE SOUTHEAST LLC, a.k.a. Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC f.k.a. Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. a.k.a. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership d.b.a. Time Warner Cable and TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP, d.b.a. Time Warner Cable
: SERVICE
Rudert et al v. Time Warner Cable Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00819
Plaintiff: Bonnie Rudert and Gary Rudert
Defendant: Time Warner Cable Inc. , Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC , Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01727
Plaintiff: Stanley Johnson
Defendant: Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership and South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arthur Butler v. Time Warner Entertainment Co., et al
as 15-3241
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARTHUR L. BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee: TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, L.P., dba Time Warner Cable and TIME WARNER CABLE MIDWEST LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?