Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Oakworth Capital Bank v. RC Nashville Development Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Oakworth Capital Bank
Defendant:
RC Nashville Development Partners, LLC and Timothy J. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Oakworth Capital Bank v. 6101 Sligo, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Oakworth Capital Bank
Defendant:
6101 Sligo, LLC and Timothy J. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DENT v. PARISI et al
as 5:2023cv02675
Petitioner:
ROBERT WILSON DENT
Respondent:
THOMAS G. PARISI, ELLEN R. WEST, TIMOTHY J. MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morris v. Jayco, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Timothy C Morris and Timothy Charles Morris
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
DENT v. MORRIS et al
as 5:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON DENT
Defendant:
TIMOTHY J. MORRIS, DARREN SMITH, YISLEIDY D. MINAYA-VARGAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jobe v. Morris
as 21-60273
Respondent / Appellee:
Timothy J. Morris, Superintendent
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dennis Jobe
Morris v. United Intertrade, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00159
Defendant:
Albertson's LLC and United Intertrade, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bowie v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 4:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Sharon Hampton, Lee Simon, Warden Timothy J. Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Eligha Bowie, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Chapman v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 4:2020cv00216
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., James Cooksey, Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall Devon Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
