Cases 21 - 30 of 126
Chisolm v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv03506
Plaintiff:
Don Survi Chisolm and Don-Survi Chisolm
Defendant:
Associate Warden Timothy Clark, Chaplain Moultrie, Brian Sterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Williams et al
as 2:2021cv03090
Plaintiff:
Brittany Reid
Defendant:
Randall Williams, Ann Sheppard, Timothy Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Ravenell et al
as 1:2021cv03134
Plaintiff:
David Allen Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Ravenell, Timothy Clark, Ann Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise v. Jefferson et al
as 6:2021cv02713
Plaintiff:
Cederick Wise
Defendant:
Sharama Jefferson, Roosevelt Reeves, Reginald Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62555
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Koon v. Timothy Clark
as 21-7072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY CLARK, JORDAN WILLIAMS, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Defendant:
NURSE SARAH LENTZ, DOCTOR SEAN JONES, TRIDENT MEDICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Timothy Clark v. Josie Gastelo
as 21-55733
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSIE GASTELO, Warden
Pilcher v. Kendall et al
as 2:2021cv01375
Defendant:
M Berardo, South Carolina Dept. of Corr., Brian Kendall and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Pilcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Menning et al
as 4:2021cv01010
Defendant:
Danielle Menning, Kevin Walker, Sheriff Brian McLaughlin and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulmer v. Kendell et al
as 9:2021cv01424
Defendant:
Brian Kendell, Timothy Clark, Carol Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Fulmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
