Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15161
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Estate of Gregory Martinez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv05586
Plaintiff:
Estate of Gregory Martinez, Judy Martinez, Gregory Martinez Jr. and others
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, County of Los Angeles, Alejandro Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18606
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39831
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03884
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Holladay et al
as 4:2020cv01148
Defendant:
Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Charles Doc Holladay, Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03414
Plaintiff:
Johnathan (I) Hancock, Terry Schramek, Shaun Lackovic and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP, 3M Company, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01298
Plaintiff:
Terry Schramek, Shaun Lackovic, J. B. and others
Defendant:
National Foam Inc., Kidde Fire Fighting, Inc, The 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTINEZ v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv01477
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TIMOTHY MARTINEZ, SR.
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
