Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MCFADDEN v. APPLE INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03779
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER BRIAN QUIRPLE, POLICE OFFICER JASON REID, POLICE OFFICER ANGEL ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
TALLI J. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY et al v. SAM'S REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST et al
as 3:2016cv02261
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MURPHY
Defendant:
SAM'S REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST , DELAWARE VALLEY PAVING CO., INC. , ABC CORPS. 1-5 and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
SAM'S REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST
Third_party_defendant:
DELAWARE VALLEY PAVING CO., INC.
Cross_claimant:
DELAWARE VALLEY PAVING CO., INC.
Cross_defendant:
DELAWARE VALLEY PAVING CO., INC. , ABC CORPS. 1-5, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AUTRY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv06565
Plaintiff:
JEHIEL AUTRY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CHARLES H. RAMSEY , JASON REID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv02547
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. LEWIS , JAMES A. LEWIS, II , MARQUIS J. LEWIS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JONATHAN JOSEY, PAUL GROVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SALAZ v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv91329
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL M. SALAZ
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., AGA GAS, INC., AGA GAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Timothy Murphy v. Fayette Cty Prison
as 08-2175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY MURPHY
Defendant - Appellee:
FAYETTE CTY PRISON
v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2007cv68249
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MURPHY and MARY MURPHY
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKAGING CO., INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION, BABCOCK & WILCOX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MURPHY v. FAYETTE COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2007cv00823
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MURPHY
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
