Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Walter v. Eugene School District 4J
as 6:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Walter
Defendant:
Eugene School District 4J
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00855
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Macauley et al v. Collier County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2021cv00300
Plaintiff:
as PR of Estate Roger Macauley, Timothy Paul Kusma, Dec'd and Roger Macauley
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk and Collier County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. Hickman et al
as 7:2020cv00212
Defendant:
Western Surety Company, Burnis Lee Wilkins, Jr., Bunyan Ford Howell, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Britt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORMAN v. COMMUNITY INTEGRATION SUPPORT SERVICES et al
as 1:2019cv01606
Plaintiff:
RANITA NORMAN
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PAUL and COMMUNITY INTEGRATION SUPPORT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Alexander v. Estrada et al
as 4:2017cv00583
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Alexander
Defendant:
Tracy Estrada, Robert Estrada and RT Properties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00936
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Stanke v. The Top C.I.A. Official Eugene Oregon
as 6:2017cv00383
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Stanke
Defendant:
The Learning Center and The Top C.I.A. Official Eugene Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
