Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Timothy Goebel v. J. MacDonald
as 13-56318
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY ROBERT GOEBEL
Respondent - Appellee:
J. MACDONALD, La Palma Correctional Center
Timothy Robert Goebel v. J MacDonald
as 2:2013cv02149
Petitioner:
Timothy Robert Goebel
Respondent:
J MacDonald
Laura M Wells et al v. American Polygraph Association et al
as 2:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Laura M Wells, Kelley L Bradbury, Morgan M Block and others
Defendant:
American Polygraph Association, Barry Cushman, Charles Slupski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Timothy Roberts v. Michael Astrue
as 2:2013cv02182
Plaintiff:
Timothy Roberts
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Heras et al v. OTG Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06138
Plaintiff:
Damaris Sellas, Isabella Michael, Katherine Corro and others
Defendant:
OTG Management T8 LLC, Eric Blatstein, LaGuardia USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BENNETT et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv06938
Plaintiff:
TONY L. BENNETT , FREDERICK BROCK , SHANNON BROCK and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bennett et al v. National Football League et al
as 1:2012cv03878
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Bennett , Frederick Brock , Shannon Brock and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Carrillo v. McDonald et al
as 1:2012cv01203
Respondent:
Mike McDonald
Petitioner:
Timothy Robert Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
v. McDonald et al
as 1:2012at00490
Respondent:
Mike McDonald
Defendant:
Timothy Robert Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harlow v. Jennings
as 7:2011cv00591
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and William D. Jennings
Petitioner:
Timothy Robert Harlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
