Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Soderberg v. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Judith M. Soderberg
Defendant:
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cedric Francois, Federico Grossi and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Sullivan
as 1:2020cv10802
Plaintiff:
NagraStar LLC and DISH Network L.L.C.
Defendant:
Timothy Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jenkins v. Housing Court Department, et al
as 20-1124
Defendant:
EAMONN GILL, Labor Counsel, Human Resources Department of the Massachusetts Trial Courts, MAURA T. HEALEY, Attorney General, PAUL BURKE, Deputy Court Administrator of the Massachusetts Housing Courts and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MA TRIAL COURT, BOSTON HOUSING COURTS and MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING COURTS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HECTOR M. JENKINS
Sullivan v. Green Bay Packaging Inc
as 5:2017cv00862
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sullivan
Defendant:
Green Bay Packaging Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Timothy Sullivan
as 17-15346
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY SULLIVAN
Sullivan v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00078
Appellant:
Timothy Sullivan
Appellee:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373 Appeal of Decision - DOI
OS1 v. Timothy Weisenberger, et al
as 2:2001cv10449
Defendant:
Carolina Networking Solutions, Carolina Networking Solutions Inc, Timothy Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
OS1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
OS1 v. Weisenberger et al
as 3:2008mc00063
Plaintiff:
OS1 and OS1
Defendant:
Timothy Weisenberger, Timothy Sullivan, Carolina Networking Solutions and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
