Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00970
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Washava Moye
as 23-2289
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHAVA MOYE, officially as Interim Director of Alvin S. Glen Detention Center ("ASGDC") for injunctive relief and declaratory relief, and individually for damages, SPECIFIC EMPLOYEES OF ASGDC, who negligently and/or intentionally injured plaintiff, individually for damages, RICHLAND COUNTY, ("RC"), SC, for damages and others
Hudgens v. Tinsley Real Estate
as 6:2023cv03537
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Hudgens
Defendant:
Tinsley Real Estate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Willie Smith v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7194
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE TINSLEY SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Jimmy Tinsley v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6470
Petitioner / Appellant:
JIMMY EDWARD TINSLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Department of Corrections
Tinsley et al v. Lennar Carolinas LLC
as 2:2022cv00432
Defendant:
Lennar Carolinas LLC, Lennar Carolinas, Coastal Carolinas Division of Lennar and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Tinsley, Terry Headley and Wayne Scarsella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
