Cases 21 - 30 of 213
Bridges, II v. Louthan et al
as 6:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Kris Edward Bridges, II
Defendant:
David Louthan, Mike Elkins, Eric Fritcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Headley et al
as 2:2022cv00653
Petitioner:
Corderell Oliver and Demone Tinsley
Respondent:
Joseph H Headley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tinsley v. State of Texas
as 4:2022cv00405
Petitioner:
Michael Shane Tinsley
Respondent:
State of Texas and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimmy Tinsley v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6470
Petitioner / Appellant:
JIMMY EDWARD TINSLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Department of Corrections
Mills v. Tinsley et al
as 5:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Chris Ryan Mills
Defendant:
Josh Tinsley, Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, Oklahoma Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams, et al
as 22-5056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00090
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeLaGarza v. Akwitti et al
as 6:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Cesar DeLaGarza
Defendant:
Warden FNU Akwitti, Lt. FNU Rancfer, Mental Health Mental Retardation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
