Cases 1 - 10 of 86
CAIN v. EIG SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2026cv01619
Plaintiff:
TIONA CAIN
Defendant:
EIG SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Collins v. Hughes
as 3:2026cv00962
Plaintiff:
Neiman Collins
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Kimberly Hvarre, Jeremiah Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ortiz v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2026cv03212
Plaintiff:
Jose L Ortiz
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, Tiona Farrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Hughes et al
as 3:2026cv03172
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Wells
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Tiona Farrington and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willett v. Lincoln Correctional Center et al
as 3:2025cv02097
Plaintiff:
Stephen Willett
Defendant:
Lincoln Correctional Center, Lt. Kennedy and Tiona Farrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Farrington et al
as 3:2025cv03326
Plaintiff:
Dustin Nelson
Defendant:
Tiona Farrington, Michael Cox, . Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daily v. Baker et al
as 3:2025cv03276
Defendant:
Shelbi Rentmeister, Michael J. Baker, Daniel Lara and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Daily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Farrington et al
as 3:2025cv03269
Plaintiff:
Torry Jenkins
Defendant:
Tiona Farrington, Natasha Dillard, LaToya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul-Edwards v. Heinz et al
as 3:2025cv03270
Plaintiff:
Ieshia Paul-Edwards
Defendant:
Derek Heinz, Latoya Hughes, Justin Hammers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
