Cases 11 - 20 of 148
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Johnson v. Mays et al
as 3:2022cv00442
Defendant:
Tobie Lynn Mays, Tobie Johnson, Tobie Tubbs and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moyers #502809 v. Olsen et al
as 1:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Joshua Moyers #502809
Defendant:
Unknown Olsen, Unknown Morrel, Unknown Whyte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02297
Plaintiff:
Tobie Coffey
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goldstein v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Toby Goldstein
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
De La Torre Cueto et al v. Tolentino et al
as 2:2022cv02079
Plaintiff:
Karla C De La Torre Cueto, Paola W De La Torre Cueto, Eufemia Garcia Diaz and others
Defendant:
Maria Tolentino, Edgar Martinez and ARAS Business Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rogers v. Toby et al
as 4:2021cv12412
Plaintiff:
James M. Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Toby, Isabel Chapman, Leanna Okar and others
Lane v. Love et al
as 3:2021cv00346
Plaintiff:
Toby R Lane
Defendant:
Stoney Love, Sgt. Katie Wilson, Lt. Mallory Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv03577
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
James Toby Coffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Toby Lamb, II v. Brant Kendrick, et al
as 21-3390
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BRANT KENDRICK, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BRITTANY MAXWELL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JUSTIN REECE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOBY LAMB, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
