Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Martinez v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Tommy Martinez
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell et al v. Washington
as 4:2021cv10705
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Bell, Martinneze Moore, Alan Lane and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Richard Russell, Gary Miniard and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Carol Walker, Eustachio Villarreal, Dr. Sharon Oliver and others
Tommy Martinez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 18-13290
Petitioner:
TOMMY MARTINEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. The People of The State of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00716
Plaintiff:
Tommy Martinez
Defendant:
The People of the State of New York and Kings County Municipal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. The People of The State of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05106
Plaintiff:
Tommy Martinez
Defendant:
The People of The State of New York and Kings County Municipal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nohr v. Jang et al
as 8:2017mc00003
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Nohr
Defendant:
Corinna Jang, Melissa Thompson, Lynnette Allen and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Nohr v. Jang et al
as 2:2017mc00002
Plaintiff:
Jason L Nohr
Defendant:
Corinna Jang, Chris Litsey, Patrick Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Nohr v. Jang et al
as 1:2014cv02761
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Nohr
Defendant:
Corinna Jang, Chris Litsey, Mary Jane Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Zaunbrecher v. Wiley et al
as 3:2013cv00511
Defendant:
Michelle Gaudin, Paul Hall, Tommy Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Carmon Zaunbrecher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Gaudin et al
as 3:2013cv00283
Defendant:
Ascension Parish Sheriff, Michelle Marie Gaudin and Tommy Martinez
Plaintiff:
Marie Marcell Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
