Cases 41 - 50 of 57
BORCHARDT v. KING, et al
as 1:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
CURTIS BORCHARDT
Defendant:
KELLY S. KING, CHRISTOPHER L HENSON, DARYL N. BIBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
United States v. Tommie Thompson
as 10-1168
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Tommie Thompson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv02911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Thompson v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2009cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tommy Thompson
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Pam Hearn and Pam Austin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christie v. Thompson et al
as 4:2008cv02733
Plaintiff:
Christopher Christie
Defendant:
Tommy Thompson, Zoch and Leslie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christie vs Taxis et al
as 4:2008cv02648
Plaintiff:
Christopher Christie
Defendant:
John Taxis, A. Buencamino, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christie v. Thompson et al
as 4:2008mc00420
Plaintiff:
Christopher Christie
Defendant:
Tommy Thompson, Zoch and Leslie
Beutel v. Ingalls
as 08-50587
Debtor - (null):
In the Matter of: GARY L BRADLEY
Appellee:
RONALD E INGALLS, Chapter 7 Trustee
Appellant:
BRADLEY BEUTEL and TOMMY THOMPSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, as Trustee of the Lazarus Exempt Trust
Street v. Thompson, et al
as 08-20370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BARTON STREET
Defendant - Appellee:
TOMMY THOMPSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Harris County Sheriff Department, BROWNFIELD and BAILEY
Ingalls v. Beutel, et al
as 08-50558
Debtor - (null):
In the Matter of: GARY L BRADLEY
Appellant:
RONALD INGALLS, Chapter 7 Trustee
Appellee:
BRADLEY BEUTEL, Form Trustee of the Lazarus Exempt Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES D GRESSETT, WILLIAM LOVE and TOMMY THOMPSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Trustee of the Lazarus Exempt Trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
