Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hanson v. Luis-Mendez et al
as 5:2026cv06889
Plaintiff: Tonnie Hanson
Defendant: Jorge Luis-Mendez, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC., Ryder Systems Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Moore v. Hilliard et al
as 4:2026cv07336
Plaintiff: Rachel Moore
Defendant: Tonnis Hilliard, Charlene Bustamante and Unknown CPS Caseworkers and Supervisors 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv10229
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nealy v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2026cv02144
Plaintiff: Tonnie Nealy
Defendant: ARNP Dianne Baldwin and HSA Charene Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. City of Miami Beach, Florida et al
as 1:2026cv24473
Plaintiff: Tonny R. Perez
Defendant: City of Miami Beach, Florida, Officer T. Thai and Officer Carlos Valladares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2026cv01889
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Wendall Hall, et al v. Shevaun Harris, et al
as 25-13376
Plaintiff: WENDALL JERMAINE HALL, TONNIE NEALY and CURTIS DALE, JR.
Defendant: SHEVAUN HARRIS, RAVEN REID and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv01721
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Storey, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.
as 25-2539
Plaintiff: TONNY STOREY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and THE ESTATE OF TONNY STOREY
Defendant: AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
Tonni Hurtado v. E. Emmerich
as 25-1182
Petitioner: TONNI L. HURTADO
Respondent: E. EMMERICH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?